Keeping Faith: An Essay on the Right to Travel, the Poor and the Ethical Demands of Constitutional Stare Decisis
Marie A. Failinger
Hamline University - School of Law
January 1, 1999
Loyola Poverty Law Journal, Vol. 5, p. 27, 1999
This article, written before Saenz v. Roe was decided, argues that state residency rules of the kind challenged in Saenz should not be overruled for ethical reasons. The rule of stare decisis is based on the value of integrity, though that is different for institutions than for individuals. People and institutions must be able to trust the courts, and the courts must in return both demand accountability from other branches and engage in trustworthy decisional behavior.
Number of Pages in PDF File: 23
Keywords: Faith, ethics, poor, poverty, welfare, travel, stare decisis, residential restrictions, Shapiro v. ThompsonAccepted Paper Series
Date posted: November 5, 2011
© 2015 Social Science Electronic Publishing, Inc. All Rights Reserved.
This page was processed by apollo2 in 0.438 seconds