Abstract

http://ssrn.com/abstract=1929576
 


 



Social Ethics as a Resource in Constitutional Adjudication


Howard J. Vogel


Hamline University - School of Law

January 1, 1984

Annual Society of Christian Ethics, p. 273, 1984

Abstract:     
This paper is an invitation to ethicists to join with lawyers in a new collaborative enterprise, namely the day-to-day work of Constitutional litigation, actively participating in the litigation process. It explores the need for two tasks to be carried out: (1) the need for ethicists to focus on the ethical nature of the adjudicatory task and evaluate decisions based on ethics and (2) the need for ethicists to actively collaborate with lawyers in cases involving rights-based Constitutional claims. The author argues that Constitutional adjudication in human rights cases is a form of ethical discourse. Judicial tasks need to be carried out with an appreciation of this phenomenon as an expression of the intersection and interaction of law and religion.

Number of Pages in PDF File: 41

Keywords: Social ethics, ethicists, Constitutional adjudication, law and religion

JEL Classification: D71, K00, K4

Accepted Paper Series





Download This Paper

Date posted: April 2, 2013  

Suggested Citation

Vogel, Howard J., Social Ethics as a Resource in Constitutional Adjudication (January 1, 1984). Annual Society of Christian Ethics, p. 273, 1984. Available at SSRN: http://ssrn.com/abstract=1929576

Contact Information

Howard J. Vogel (Contact Author)
Hamline University - School of Law ( email )
1536 Hewitt Avenue
Saint Paul, MN 55104-1237
United States
Feedback to SSRN


Paper statistics
Abstract Views: 99
Downloads: 4

© 2014 Social Science Electronic Publishing, Inc. All Rights Reserved.  FAQ   Terms of Use   Privacy Policy   Copyright   Contact Us
This page was processed by apollo8 in 0.313 seconds