Abstract

http://ssrn.com/abstract=1929588
 


 



The Case for 'Brain Death' Legislation: A Response to the Critics


William Manning


Independent

Howard J. Vogel


Hamline University - School of Law

January 1, 1979

Minnesota Medicine, Vol. 62, p. 121, 1979

Abstract:     
In 1979 Minnesota Legislature considered legislating the concept of “brain death.” Controversy about this proposal is prompted by confusion of the issues involved. Arguments of the opponents of brain death are answered. The authors do not focus on theological and philosophical questions about life, death, the quality of life, and nature of human personality as they posit that society may not yet have the answers. Rather, this article focuses on physicians, families, judges, and other important actors in the human drama of healthcare who are daily called upon to perform their roles under circumstances in which their specific responsibilities to a patient are defined by the question of brain death. The authors argue that society must come to grips with “brain death” through enacting that concept into legislation.

Number of Pages in PDF File: 7

Keywords: Brain death, brain dead, health law

JEL Classification: K00, K32, I12

Accepted Paper Series


Download This Paper

Date posted: April 3, 2013  

Suggested Citation

Manning, William and Vogel, Howard J., The Case for 'Brain Death' Legislation: A Response to the Critics (January 1, 1979). Minnesota Medicine, Vol. 62, p. 121, 1979. Available at SSRN: http://ssrn.com/abstract=1929588

Contact Information

William Manning
Independent ( email )
Howard J. Vogel (Contact Author)
Hamline University - School of Law ( email )
1536 Hewitt Avenue
Saint Paul, MN 55104-1237
United States
Feedback to SSRN


Paper statistics
Abstract Views: 103
Downloads: 7

© 2014 Social Science Electronic Publishing, Inc. All Rights Reserved.  FAQ   Terms of Use   Privacy Policy   Copyright   Contact Us
This page was processed by apollo5 in 7.016 seconds