|
||||
|
||||
Protecting Protected Speech: Why Schwarzenegger Must Terminate Violent Video Game LegislationChristopher J. ClementsBoston College Law Review April 11, 2011 Boston College Law Review, Vol. 53, No. 2, 2012 Abstract: This Note argues that current and future efforts to regulate violent video games should and will continue to fail constitutional scrutiny. Legislators should instead focus on mandating that video game developers and retailers participate in the exceedingly successful Entertainment Software Rating Board (“ESRB”) rating system. The upcoming Supreme Court decision Entertainment Merchants Association v. Schwarzenegger provides the Court with the opportunity to clarify the role of government in shielding children from objectionable media and where, if at all, violent video games fit into obscenity jurisprudence.
Number of Pages in PDF File: 30 Accepted Paper SeriesDate posted: September 20, 2011Suggested CitationContact Information
|
|
||||||||||||
© 2013 Social Science Electronic Publishing, Inc. All Rights Reserved.
FAQ
Terms of Use
Privacy Policy
Copyright
This page was processed by apollo7 in 0.328 seconds