Abstract

http://ssrn.com/abstract=1930293
 
 

Footnotes (367)



 


 



Dilution by Tarnishment: An Unworkable Cause of Action in Cases of Artistic Expression


Alexandra Olson


Boston College Law Review

September 19, 2011

Boston College Law Review, Forthcoming

Abstract:     
In response to the number of trademark and copyright infringement cases in the last ten years, and in the wake of the Trademark Dilution Revision Act (TDRA), scholarship has focused on ensuring adequate First Amendment protection for artists against infringement and dilution claims. This Note, however, seeks to push the debate in a new direction, by suggesting that First Amendment protection in the trademark dilution context has been stretched too far, leaving corporations unable to attain even injunctive relief against diluters. Unlike the more tailored and flexible free speech doctrines found in the laws of trademark infringement, copyright, and right of publicity, dilution by tarnishment effectively prevents companies from prevailing against artists who negatively depict the corporations' trademarks in their work, no matter how harmful the appropriation may be to the corporation’s mark.

Number of Pages in PDF File: 45

Accepted Paper Series





Download This Paper

Date posted: September 19, 2011  

Suggested Citation

Olson, Alexandra, Dilution by Tarnishment: An Unworkable Cause of Action in Cases of Artistic Expression (September 19, 2011). Boston College Law Review, Forthcoming. Available at SSRN: http://ssrn.com/abstract=1930293

Contact Information

Alexandra Olson (Contact Author)
Boston College Law Review ( email )
885 Centre Street
Newton, MA 02459-1163
United States
Feedback to SSRN


Paper statistics
Abstract Views: 327
Downloads: 38
Footnotes:  367

© 2014 Social Science Electronic Publishing, Inc. All Rights Reserved.  FAQ   Terms of Use   Privacy Policy   Copyright   Contact Us
This page was processed by apollo4 in 0.344 seconds