Abstract

http://ssrn.com/abstract=1930443
 
 

Citations (1)



 
 

Footnotes (313)



 


 



Retributive Justice and the Demands of Democratic Citizenship


Dan Markel


Florida State University College of Law

March 16, 2012

Virginia Journal of Criminal Law, Vol. 1, pp. 1-133, 2012

Abstract:     
This article reveals and responds to the democracy deficit in certain retributivist approaches to criminal law. Democracy deficits arise when we insufficiently recognize the moral authority of liberal democracies to create new moral obligations for us as individuals. Specifically, I will argue, in contrast to the claims of some leading criminal law theorists, that conduct can be legitimately and justly criminalized even if the conduct is not morally wrongful prior to or independent of law. In other words, once we understand the basis for our presumptive political obligations within liberal democracies, a more capacious approach to establishing criminal laws can be tolerated from a political retributivist perspective.

If I'm correct, then here are some of the implications: we are morally obligated (in a pro tanto way) to (1) conform our conduct, in our capacities as nonofficials, not only to “good” mala in se criminal laws but also many mala prohibita laws, laws that I call permissibly dumb but not illiberal; (2) to render, in our capacities as nonofficials, reasonable assistance to law enforcement of the previous categories of laws; and (3) to enforce, in our capacities as officials, these categories of laws. While the implications of this "democratic fidelity" argument are extensive, there is no moral obligation to surrender one’s judgment entirely. Indeed, officials and nonofficials have no moral obligation toward laws that are illiberal or what I call "spectacularly dumb," regardless of their valid legal status.

Like democratic criminalization choices, democratic sentencing laws must also be scrutinized. To that end, I sketch two moral frameworks that should work in conjunction with each other and with the threshold criminalization question when deciding whether to enforce, conform to, or assist enforcement efforts of criminal laws within liberal democracies.

This piece was the invited launch paper for the new Virginia Journal of Criminal Law. Professors Bowers, Cahill & Duff have written responses, and I have a reply essay.

Professor Bowers' paper can be found at: http://ssrn.com/abstract=1945743

Professor Cahill's response can be found at: http://ssrn.com/abstract=1950660

My reply essay can be found at: http://ssrn.com/abstract=1950321

Number of Pages in PDF File: 135

Keywords: legal moralism, criminal justice, retributive justice, retributivism, criminalization, political retributivism

Accepted Paper Series


Download This Paper

Date posted: September 19, 2011 ; Last revised: March 19, 2012

Suggested Citation

Markel, Dan, Retributive Justice and the Demands of Democratic Citizenship (March 16, 2012). Virginia Journal of Criminal Law, Vol. 1, pp. 1-133, 2012. Available at SSRN: http://ssrn.com/abstract=1930443

Contact Information

Dan Markel (Contact Author)
Florida State University College of Law ( email )
425 W. Jefferson Street
Tallahassee, FL 32306
United States
HOME PAGE: http://www.danmarkel.com/
Feedback to SSRN


Paper statistics
Abstract Views: 1,663
Downloads: 244
Download Rank: 68,601
Citations:  1
Footnotes:  313

© 2014 Social Science Electronic Publishing, Inc. All Rights Reserved.  FAQ   Terms of Use   Privacy Policy   Copyright   Contact Us
This page was processed by apollo8 in 0.296 seconds