Notes on a Bicentennial Constitution: Part II, Antinomial Choices and the Role of the Supreme Court
William W. Van Alstyne
William & Mary Law School
Iowa Law Review, Vol. 72, p. 1281, 1987
William & Mary Law School Research Paper No. 09-144
Continuing the examination of judicial review conducted around the Constitution’s bicentennial, this article lays bare the inconsistencies in the expected tasks of the Supreme Court. Where some roles of the Court have traditionally been treated as indivisible, examining those same roles separate from one another produces an incoherent view of the Court that is difficult to compromise.
Number of Pages in PDF File: 20
Keywords: federalism, judicial reviewAccepted Paper Series
Date posted: September 21, 2011 ; Last revised: October 6, 2011
© 2013 Social Science Electronic Publishing, Inc. All Rights Reserved.
This page was processed by apollo3 in 0.476 seconds