|
||||
|
||||
Incentives versus Transaction Costs: A Theory of Procurement Contracts
Steven Tadelis University of California, Berkeley - Haas School of Business Patrick Bajari University of Michigan at Ann Arbor - Economics; National Bureau of Economic Research (NBER) April 2001 Stanford University, Department of Economics Working Paper No. 99-029 Abstract: Inspired by facts from the private sector construction industry, we develop a model that explains many stylized facts of procurement contracts. The buyer in our model incurs a cost of providing a comprehensive design, and is faced with a trade-off between providing incentives and reducing ex post transaction costs due to costly renegotiation. We show that cost plus contracts are preferred to fixed price contracts when a project is more complex. We briefly discuss how fixed-price or cost-plus contracts might be preferred to other incentive contracts. Finally, our model provides some micro-foundations for ideas from Transaction Cost Economics.
JEL Classifications: D23, D82, L14, L22, L74 Working Paper SeriesDate posted: November 16, 1999 ; Last revised: July 14, 2001Suggested CitationContact Information
|
|
|||||||||||||||||
© 2009 Social Science Electronic Publishing, Inc. All Rights Reserved. Terms of Use Privacy Policy
This page was served by apollo 2 in 0.110 seconds.