Abstract

http://ssrn.com/abstract=1931282
 


 



A Reply to Gonzalez, Interpreting This Constitution: Another Response to Professor Van Alstyne


William W. Van Alstyne


William & Mary Law School

September 21, 2011

Revista Juridica de la Universidad de Puerto Rico, Vol. 56, p. 759, 1987
William & Mary Law School Research Paper No. 09-147

Abstract:     
This response continues the ongoing discussion between Professor Van Alstyne and Professor Alvarez-Gonzalez regarding the interpretation of the Constitution. Van Alstyne responds to Gonzalez’s concerns by emphasizing the use history serves in constitutional interpretations and confronting the nature of interpretive methodologies used by the Court, or rather, the lack there of.

Number of Pages in PDF File: 5

Keywords: judicial review, interpretation

Accepted Paper Series


Download This Paper

Date posted: September 21, 2011 ; Last revised: October 6, 2011

Suggested Citation

Van Alstyne, William W., A Reply to Gonzalez, Interpreting This Constitution: Another Response to Professor Van Alstyne (September 21, 2011). Revista Juridica de la Universidad de Puerto Rico, Vol. 56, p. 759, 1987; William & Mary Law School Research Paper No. 09-147. Available at SSRN: http://ssrn.com/abstract=1931282

Contact Information

William W. Van Alstyne (Contact Author)
William & Mary Law School ( email )
South Henry Street
P.O. Box 8795
Williamsburg, VA 23187-8795
United States
Feedback to SSRN


Paper statistics
Abstract Views: 202
Downloads: 7

© 2014 Social Science Electronic Publishing, Inc. All Rights Reserved.  FAQ   Terms of Use   Privacy Policy   Copyright   Contact Us
This page was processed by apollo2 in 0.484 seconds