A Reply to Gonzalez, Interpreting This Constitution: Another Response to Professor Van Alstyne
William W. Van Alstyne
William & Mary Law School
September 21, 2011
Revista Juridica de la Universidad de Puerto Rico, Vol. 56, p. 759, 1987
William & Mary Law School Research Paper No. 09-147
This response continues the ongoing discussion between Professor Van Alstyne and Professor Alvarez-Gonzalez regarding the interpretation of the Constitution. Van Alstyne responds to Gonzalez’s concerns by emphasizing the use history serves in constitutional interpretations and confronting the nature of interpretive methodologies used by the Court, or rather, the lack there of.
Number of Pages in PDF File: 5
Keywords: judicial review, interpretationAccepted Paper Series
Date posted: September 21, 2011 ; Last revised: October 6, 2011
© 2014 Social Science Electronic Publishing, Inc. All Rights Reserved.
This page was processed by apollo2 in 0.484 seconds