Abstract

http://ssrn.com/abstract=1931805
 


 



First Amendment Limitations on Recovery from the Press – An Extended Comment on ‘The Anderson Solution’


William W. Van Alstyne


Duke University School of Law; William & Mary Law School

1984

William & Mary Law Review, Vol. 25, p. 793, 1984
William & Mary Law School Research Paper No. 09-151

Abstract:     
This analyzes the results of New York Times v. Sullivan and finds that publishers may actually be in greater danger from libel suits, given the inevitability of newspapers printing false statements no matter how careful the press may be. By forcing plaintiffs to focus on proving actual malice on the part of the publisher, courts may inadvertently encourage jurors to be unsympathetic to publishers.

Number of Pages in PDF File: 32

Keywords: Libel, First Amendment

Accepted Paper Series





Download This Paper

Date posted: September 22, 2011 ; Last revised: October 6, 2011

Suggested Citation

Van Alstyne, William W., First Amendment Limitations on Recovery from the Press – An Extended Comment on ‘The Anderson Solution’ (1984). William & Mary Law Review, Vol. 25, p. 793, 1984; William & Mary Law School Research Paper No. 09-151. Available at SSRN: http://ssrn.com/abstract=1931805

Contact Information

William W. Van Alstyne (Contact Author)
Duke University School of Law ( email )
210 Science Drive
Box 90362
Durham, NC 27708
United States
William & Mary Law School ( email )
South Henry Street
P.O. Box 8795
Williamsburg, VA 23187-8795
United States
Feedback to SSRN


Paper statistics
Abstract Views: 261
Downloads: 9

© 2014 Social Science Electronic Publishing, Inc. All Rights Reserved.  FAQ   Terms of Use   Privacy Policy   Copyright   Contact Us
This page was processed by apollo7 in 0.281 seconds