|
||||
|
||||
Enforcement and Disclosure under Regulation FD: An Empirical AnalysisPaul A. GriffinUniversity of California, Davis - Graduate School of Management David H. LontUniversity of Otago - Department of Accountancy and Finance Benjamin SegalINSEAD - Accounting & Control Area September 21, 2011 Accounting & Finance, Forthcoming Abstract: While Regulation FD was designed to benefit investors by curbing the selective disclosure of material non-public information to “covered” investors, such as analysts and institutional investors, it can also impose costs. This paper finds that FD levies three kinds of enforcement and disclosure costs. First, investors cannot recover as part of an SEC enforcement action the gains to covered investors from their alleged use of the non-public information. Second, investors lose because the market responds negatively to an SEC enforcement announcement. Third, investors suffer because some companies post their FD filings well after the due date, without earlier public disclosure.
Keywords: Regulation FD, Enforcement Action, Untimely FD Disclosure, Late SEC Filing, Event Study JEL Classification: G14, K22, M41 Accepted Paper SeriesDate posted: September 23, 2011Suggested CitationContact Information
|
|
|||||||||||||||
© 2013 Social Science Electronic Publishing, Inc. All Rights Reserved.
FAQ
Terms of Use
Privacy Policy
Copyright
This page was processed by apollo3 in 0.453 seconds