Abstract

http://ssrn.com/abstract=1931936
 
 

Footnotes (319)



 


 



Judicial Deference to Legislatures in Constitutional Analysis


Drury D. Stevenson


South Texas College of Law

July 21, 2011

North Carolina Law Review, Vol. 90, p. 2083, 2012

Abstract:     
North Carolina is one of the only states to have a statutory definition of voluntary consent for police searches; it essentially codified the Supreme Court’s “Bustamonte” rule. In theory, this statute could eventually face a constitutional challenge if the Supreme Court adopted a requirement of informed consent – police warnings of the right to refuse a search – as many have urged. Considering this possibility as a hypothetical, it seems strange that conventional Fourth Amendment analysis has largely ignored whether challenged state actions are legislative, executive, or judicial; attention has focused instead on federalism concerns, interpretive approaches, and tradeoffs between public safety and individual privacy. Nevertheless, there are both policy reasons and anecdotal evidence suggesting that the Supreme Court should, and in fact occasionally does, defer to legislatures in certain matters of criminal procedure, even when it would not defer to identical decisions by police. The potential clash between this statute and constitutional doctrine illustrates these points nicely. This Article uses this localized example as a launching point to address the larger issue of how state legislation can color the Supreme Court’s analysis. Separation of powers is an important but unexplored component of criminal procedure, and this Article is a first foray into this inquiry. This missing piece of Fourth Amendment analysis has broad implications for many areas of criminal procedure.

Number of Pages in PDF File: 69

Keywords: Separation of Powers, Fourth Amendment, Schneckloth, Bustamonte, Consent, Search, Police, Vehicles, Criminal Procedure, Legislature, Kentucky v. King

JEL Classification: K14, K42, K40

Accepted Paper Series





Download This Paper

Date posted: September 23, 2011 ; Last revised: September 27, 2013

Suggested Citation

Stevenson, Drury D., Judicial Deference to Legislatures in Constitutional Analysis (July 21, 2011). North Carolina Law Review, Vol. 90, p. 2083, 2012. Available at SSRN: http://ssrn.com/abstract=1931936

Contact Information

Drury D. Stevenson (Contact Author)
South Texas College of Law ( email )
1303 San Jacinto Street
Houston, TX 77002
United States
713-646-1897 (Phone)
HOME PAGE: http://www.stcl.edu
Feedback to SSRN


Paper statistics
Abstract Views: 783
Downloads: 118
Download Rank: 141,528
Footnotes:  319
People who downloaded this paper also downloaded:
1. Costs of Codification
By Drury Stevenson

2. To Whom Is The Law Addressed?
By Drury Stevenson

© 2014 Social Science Electronic Publishing, Inc. All Rights Reserved.  FAQ   Terms of Use   Privacy Policy   Copyright   Contact Us
This page was processed by apollo1 in 0.375 seconds