Abstract

 


 



Interpreting This Constitution: The Unhelpful Contributions of Special Theories of Judicial Review


William W. Van Alstyne


William & Mary Law School

1983

University of Florida Law Review, Vol. 35, p. 209, 1983
William & Mary Law School Research Paper No. 09-156

Abstract:     
This paper examines several different theories surrounding judicial review and finds many of these theories lacking. Modern trends of literal interpretations and precise language have removed the optimistic nature of Constitutional language and is largely responsible for the hesitancy of other nations to adopt a supreme constitution.

Number of Pages in PDF File: 28

Keywords: judicial review, interpretation

Accepted Paper Series


Download This Paper

Date posted: September 24, 2011 ; Last revised: October 6, 2011

Suggested Citation

Van Alstyne, William W., Interpreting This Constitution: The Unhelpful Contributions of Special Theories of Judicial Review (1983). University of Florida Law Review, Vol. 35, p. 209, 1983; William & Mary Law School Research Paper No. 09-156. Available at SSRN: http://ssrn.com/abstract=1932347

Contact Information

William W. Van Alstyne (Contact Author)
William & Mary Law School ( email )
South Henry Street
P.O. Box 8795
Williamsburg, VA 23187-8795
United States
Feedback to SSRN (Beta)


Paper statistics
Abstract Views: 277
Downloads: 28

© 2013 Social Science Electronic Publishing, Inc. All Rights Reserved.  FAQ   Terms of Use   Privacy Policy   Copyright
This page was processed by apollo1 in 0.422 seconds