Private Antitrust Enforcement in the United States and the European Union: Standing and Antitrust Injury
Jeffrey Lynch Harrison
University of Florida - Fredric G. Levin College of Law
September 23, 2011
This paper discusses and compares the implications of U.S. and E.U. standards for antitrust standing and antitrust injury with respect to private enforcement. In the U.S. these concepts are relatively well defined. In the E.U. they are still subject to a period of interpretation. The comparison is complicated by the difference in emphasis in the two systems. In the U.S. private actions are designed principally to have a deterrent effect. In the E.U. the goal is more compensation oriented. The article concludes that as a result of treble damages, the U.S. system is more consistent with both goals and that more liberal standards in the E.U. are unlikely to overcome the absence of a punitive element in antitrust recoveries.
Number of Pages in PDF File: 32working papers series
Date posted: September 23, 2011 ; Last revised: September 25, 2011
© 2013 Social Science Electronic Publishing, Inc. All Rights Reserved.
This page was processed by apollo4 in 0.860 seconds