Abstract

http://ssrn.com/abstract=1933768
 


 



Toward More Parsimony and Transparency in 'The Essentials of Marriage'


Anita Bernstein


Brooklyn Law School

September 26, 2011

Michigan State Law Review, Vol. 81, 2011
Brooklyn Law School, Legal Studies Paper No. 250

Abstract:     
Written for a symposium about marriage-related innovation, this article catalogs impediments to freedom of contract related to marriage that American judges and legislatures have put in the law and continue to impose. Although many of these impediments have become quaint, 'defense of marriage' statutes codified in the last fifteen years have made this interference worse. Marriage is a legal status, of course, and Status defeats Contract almost by definition. From a premise that the state ought to use its interference power sparingly, however, the article calls for more parsimony and transparency in the law of marriage: Constraints on freedom related to marriage should be kept to a reasonable minimum; to the extent they persist, these constraints ought to be intelligible.

Number of Pages in PDF File: 58

Keywords: marriage, DOMA, essentials, freedom of contract, transparency, coverture, annulment, services, duty of support, domicile

Accepted Paper Series





Download This Paper

Date posted: September 27, 2011  

Suggested Citation

Bernstein, Anita, Toward More Parsimony and Transparency in 'The Essentials of Marriage' (September 26, 2011). Michigan State Law Review, Vol. 81, 2011; Brooklyn Law School, Legal Studies Paper No. 250. Available at SSRN: http://ssrn.com/abstract=1933768

Contact Information

Anita Bernstein (Contact Author)
Brooklyn Law School ( email )
250 Joralemon Street
Brooklyn, NY 11201
United States

Feedback to SSRN


Paper statistics
Abstract Views: 788
Downloads: 46

© 2014 Social Science Electronic Publishing, Inc. All Rights Reserved.  FAQ   Terms of Use   Privacy Policy   Copyright   Contact Us
This page was processed by apollo6 in 0.282 seconds