Abstract

 


 



The Settlement between the SEC and Goldman Sachs of July 2010 and the Following Misplaced Proposal of Imposing a Fiduciary Duty on Broker-Dealers


Michele Cea


Fordham University School of Law

September 7, 2011


Abstract:     
This work is primarily focused on the settlement between the SEC and Goldman Sachs of July 2010 related to the structuring and marketing of a Collateralised Debt Obligation (CDO) known as Abacus 2007-AC1. A thorough discussion of this case leads to analyze the idea of a imposing a fiduciary duty on broker-dealers. This work explains why this proposal should be disregarded. Finally, it is given a glance to recent cases similar to the one between the SEC and Goldman Sachs.

Keywords: Investment banks, broker-dealers, Dodd-Frank Act, fiduciary duties, Goldman Sachs, SEC, CDO, ABACUS, Securities Law, Finance Law

JEL Classification: K22, N20, G20, G21, G24, G14, G15, G18, F30, F20, F23, F00

working papers series


Date posted: September 28, 2011  

Suggested Citation

Cea, Michele, The Settlement between the SEC and Goldman Sachs of July 2010 and the Following Misplaced Proposal of Imposing a Fiduciary Duty on Broker-Dealers (September 7, 2011). Available at SSRN: http://ssrn.com/abstract=1934769

Contact Information

Michele Cea (Contact Author)
Fordham University School of Law ( email )
140 West 62nd Street
New York, NY 10023
United States
Feedback to SSRN (Beta)


Paper statistics
Abstract Views: 154

© 2013 Social Science Electronic Publishing, Inc. All Rights Reserved.  FAQ   Terms of Use   Privacy Policy   Copyright
This page was processed by apollo2 in 0.312 seconds