Chance and Litigation

Enrique Guerra-Pujol

University of Central Florida; Pontifical Catholic University of Puerto Rico

September 28, 2011

Boston University Public Interest Law Journal, Vol. 21, No. 1 (Fall 2011), pp. 45-59

Is the litigation game as random as a coin toss? In this paper, the author presents the results of his preliminary research regarding the randomness of litigation. Specifically, the author formulates and then tests his “random litigation hypothesis” -- the conjecture that the litigation game is a random process with just two possible outcomes, like a coin toss, and that the litigants to a dispute are essentially playing a game of chance when they submit their dispute to a court for resolution.

Number of Pages in PDF File: 16

Keywords: chance, randomness, coin toss, litigation game, random litigation hypothesis, relative frequency

JEL Classification: C81, C83, K41

Open PDF in Browser Download This Paper

Date posted: September 30, 2011 ; Last revised: September 10, 2014

Suggested Citation

Guerra-Pujol, Enrique, Chance and Litigation (September 28, 2011). Boston University Public Interest Law Journal, Vol. 21, No. 1 (Fall 2011), pp. 45-59. Available at SSRN: http://ssrn.com/abstract=1935087 or http://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.1935087

Contact Information

Enrique Guerra-Pujol (Contact Author)
University of Central Florida ( email )
Orlando, FL 32816
United States
HOME PAGE: http://www.priorprobability.com
Pontifical Catholic University of Puerto Rico ( email )
Feedback to SSRN

Paper statistics
Abstract Views: 1,361
Downloads: 576
Download Rank: 33,745

© 2016 Social Science Electronic Publishing, Inc. All Rights Reserved.  FAQ   Terms of Use   Privacy Policy   Copyright   Contact Us
This page was processed by apollobot1 in 0.188 seconds