Abstract

 
 

References (30)



 


 



Experimental Evidence on English Auctions: Oral Outcry Versus Clock


Ricardo Goncalves


affiliation not provided to SSRN

John D. Hey


University of York (UK); Università degli Studi di Bari “Aldo Moro” - Facolta' di Economia

October 2011

Bulletin of Economic Research, Vol. 63, Issue 4, pp. 313-352, 2011

Abstract:     
This paper tests experimentally, in a common value setting, the equivalence between the Japanese English auction (or clock auction) and an oral outcry auction where bidders are allowed to call their own bids. We find that (i) bidding behaviour is different in each type of auction, but also that (ii) this difference in bidding behaviour does not affect significantly the auction prices. This lends some support to the equivalence between these two types of auction. The winner's curse is present: overbidding led to higher than expected prices (under Nash bidding strategies) in both types of auction. Although interesting and encouraging, the results clearly indicate that further research is necessary, particularly with a modified experimental design.

Number of Pages in PDF File: 40

Keywords: discrete bidding, English auctions, winner's curse

JEL Classification: C50, C91, D44

Accepted Paper Series


Date posted: September 29, 2011  

Suggested Citation

Goncalves, Ricardo and Hey, John D., Experimental Evidence on English Auctions: Oral Outcry Versus Clock (October 2011). Bulletin of Economic Research, Vol. 63, Issue 4, pp. 313-352, 2011. Available at SSRN: http://ssrn.com/abstract=1935217 or http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-8586.2009.00337.x

Contact Information

Ricardo Goncalves (Contact Author)
affiliation not provided to SSRN
John D. Hey
University of York (UK) ( email )
Heslington
York YO10 5DD
United Kingdom
44 904 433575 (Phone)
44 904 433575 (Fax)
Università degli Studi di Bari “Aldo Moro” - Facolta' di Economia
Piazza Cesare Battisti 1
70121 Bari, Taranto 74100
Italy
Feedback to SSRN (Beta)


Paper statistics
Abstract Views: 122
Downloads: 2
References:  30

© 2013 Social Science Electronic Publishing, Inc. All Rights Reserved.  FAQ   Terms of Use   Privacy Policy   Copyright
This page was processed by apollo5 in 0.922 seconds