Abstract

http://ssrn.com/abstract=1935292
 
 

Footnotes (70)



 


 



More Intelligent Design: Testing Measures of Merit


Kimberly West-Faulcon


Loyola Law School Los Angeles

June 15, 2011

University of Pennsylvania Journal of Constitutional Law, Vol. 13, No. 5, 2011
Loyola-LA Legal Studies Paper No. 2011-45

Abstract:     
This Article articulates the theoretical, legal, and policy implications of new and improved theories of intelligence and recent research finding that conventional mass-marketed standardized tests, or 'factorist tests,' have less predictive power and larger racial differences in scores than newer multidimensional 'systems-based' tests. It raises a new question about the fairness of the role that traditional admissions tests like the SAT, GRE, LSAT, and MCAT currently play in selective higher education admissions - whether basing admissions on scores on such tests unfairly distorts the true admissions-related merit of individual applicants and racial groups. The core of this argument is not that selective universities rely on a flawed definition of merit or that traditional factorist tests are racially, economically, or culturally biased. Instead, this Article considers the ramifications of social science evidence suggesting that the admissions tests most commonly relied upon today are less successful in predicting applicants' future academic performance and have more racially skewed scores because they are designed according to a scientifically flawed theory of intelligence.

Number of Pages in PDF File: 65

Keywords: intelligence, standardized testing, test scores, test deficiency, SAT, LSAT, selective admissions, Title VI, disparate impact, Fourteenth Amendment

Accepted Paper Series





Download This Paper

Date posted: September 29, 2011 ; Last revised: December 8, 2011

Suggested Citation

West-Faulcon, Kimberly, More Intelligent Design: Testing Measures of Merit (June 15, 2011). University of Pennsylvania Journal of Constitutional Law, Vol. 13, No. 5, 2011; Loyola-LA Legal Studies Paper No. 2011-45. Available at SSRN: http://ssrn.com/abstract=1935292

Contact Information

Kimberly West-Faulcon (Contact Author)
Loyola Law School Los Angeles ( email )
919 Albany Street
Los Angeles, CA 90015-1211
United States
213-736-8172 (Phone)
Feedback to SSRN


Paper statistics
Abstract Views: 932
Downloads: 77
Download Rank: 188,708
Footnotes:  70
Paper comments
No comments have been made on this paper

© 2014 Social Science Electronic Publishing, Inc. All Rights Reserved.  FAQ   Terms of Use   Privacy Policy   Copyright   Contact Us
This page was processed by apollo8 in 0.593 seconds