Second Thoughts on Rust v. Sullivan and the First Amendment
William W. Van Alstyne
William & Mary Law School
Constitutional Commentary, Vol. 9, No. 5, 1992
William & Mary Law School Research Paper No. 09-165
This reaction to the decision and commentary on Rust v. Sullivan advances two parallel hypotheticals as a means of addressing the divisive nature of the issue in Rust, that is may a government speaker be required to encourage certain viewpoint regarding the use of abortion in family planning.
Number of Pages in PDF File: 5
Keywords: First Amendment, Government Speech, AbortionAccepted Paper Series
Date posted: October 1, 2011 ; Last revised: October 6, 2011
© 2014 Social Science Electronic Publishing, Inc. All Rights Reserved.
This page was processed by apollo6 in 0.531 seconds