Abstract

 


 



Religion and Race: The Ministerial Exception Reexamined


Ian C. Bartrum


University of Nevada, Las Vegas, William S. Boyd School of Law

August 18, 2011

Colloquy: Northwestern University Law Review, Vol. 106, p. 191, 2011
UNLV William S. Boyd School of Law Legal Studies Research Paper Series

Abstract:     
This essay is a contribution to the Northwestern University Law Review's colloquy on the ministerial exception, convened following the Supreme Court's decision to hear arguments in Hosanna-Tabor v. EEOC.

I take the opportunity to consider the (sometimes) competing constitutional values of racial equality and religious freedom. I offer historical, ethical, and doctrinal arguments for the position that race must trump religion as a constitutional value when the two come into conflict. With this in mind, I suggest that the ministerial exception should not shield religious employers from anti discrimination suits brought on the basis of race.

Number of Pages in PDF File: 16

Keywords: Ministerial Exception, Racial Equality, Religious Freedom, Hosanna-Tabor, Modalities, Constitutional Theory

Accepted Paper Series


Download This Paper

Date posted: October 1, 2011 ; Last revised: February 14, 2012

Suggested Citation

Bartrum, Ian C., Religion and Race: The Ministerial Exception Reexamined (August 18, 2011). Colloquy: Northwestern University Law Review, Vol. 106, p. 191, 2011; UNLV William S. Boyd School of Law Legal Studies Research Paper Series. Available at SSRN: http://ssrn.com/abstract=1935621

Contact Information

Ian C. Bartrum (Contact Author)
University of Nevada, Las Vegas, William S. Boyd School of Law ( email )
4505 South Maryland Parkway
Box 451003
Las Vegas, NV 89154
United States
Feedback to SSRN (Beta)


Paper statistics
Abstract Views: 404
Downloads: 56
Download Rank: 190,395

© 2013 Social Science Electronic Publishing, Inc. All Rights Reserved.  FAQ   Terms of Use   Privacy Policy   Copyright
This page was processed by apollo6 in 1.172 seconds