Abstract

 
 

References (25)



 


 



Economic Analysis of Taking Rules: The Bilateral Case


Daniel Göller


University of Bonn

Michael Hewer


University of Bonn

October 11, 2011


Abstract:     
Our analysis focuses on a situation where a landowner and the government invest prior to the government's taking decision. When the government suffers from budgetary "fiscal illusion," optimal compensation amounts to the hypothetical value of the landowner's property had she invested efficiently. In contrast, under a government that maximizes social welfare, the only regime to induce the first best grants as compensation the social benefit of the taking. Consequently, if the government can only raise capital up to a certain amount, society may be better off under a non-benevolent government.

Number of Pages in PDF File: 23

Keywords: compensation for takings, eminent domain, moral hazard

JEL Classification: K11, R52, Q24

working papers series


Download This Paper

Date posted: September 30, 2011 ; Last revised: October 14, 2011

Suggested Citation

Göller, Daniel and Hewer, Michael, Economic Analysis of Taking Rules: The Bilateral Case (October 11, 2011). Available at SSRN: http://ssrn.com/abstract=1935862 or http://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.1935862

Contact Information

Daniel Göller (Contact Author)
University of Bonn ( email )
Regina-Pacis-Weg 3
Postfach 2220
Bonn, D-53012
Germany
Michael Hewer
University of Bonn ( email )
Regina-Pacis-Weg 3
Postfach 2220
Bonn, D-53012
Germany
Feedback to SSRN (Beta)


Paper statistics
Abstract Views: 367
Downloads: 40
References:  25

© 2013 Social Science Electronic Publishing, Inc. All Rights Reserved.  FAQ   Terms of Use   Privacy Policy   Copyright
This page was processed by apollo2 in 0.360 seconds