Sex, Lies, and Videogames: Brown V. Entertainment Merchants Association
David G. Post
Temple University School of Law
October 3, 2011
Cato Supreme Court Review, Vol. 27, 2011
Temple University Legal Studies Research Paper No. 2012-03
In Brown v. Entertainment Merchants Association, a decision that veteran Supreme Court watcher Linda Greenhouse called ‘‘the most surprising decision’’ of the 2010 Term (and the one that also received Greenhouse’s ‘‘most unusual judicial performance’’ award, for Justice Stephen Breyer’s dissenting opinion), the Supreme Court (7-2) struck down California’s prohibition on the sale of violent video-games to minors on the grounds that it offended First Amendment protections for the freedom of speech. In this article, I look at the doctrinal underpinnings of the majority opinion, the oddities in the two dissenting opinions (Thomas and Breyer), and offer some thoughts on the implications of the decision for First Amendment law going forward.
Number of Pages in PDF File: 31
Keywords: Constitution, First Amendment, Videogames, Obscenity, Violence, Minors
JEL Classification: K10, K19Accepted Paper Series
Date posted: October 3, 2011 ; Last revised: February 2, 2012
© 2014 Social Science Electronic Publishing, Inc. All Rights Reserved.
This page was processed by apollo5 in 0.547 seconds