A Group Construal Account of Drop-in-The-Bucket Thinking in Policy Preference and Moral Judgment
Daniel M. Bartels
University of Chicago - Booth School of Business
Russell C Burnett
affiliation not provided to SSRN
October 3, 2011
Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, Vol. 47, pp. 50-57, 2011
Columbia Business School Research Paper No. 11-16
Decisions, both moral and mundane, about saving individuals or resources at risk are often influenced not only by numbers saved and lost, but also by proportions of groups saved and lost. Consider choosing between a program that saves 60 of 240 lives at risk and one that saves 50 of 100. The first option maximizes absolute number saved; the second, proportion saved. In two studies, we show that the influence of proportions on such decisions depends on how items at risk are mentally represented. In particular, we show that proportions have greater influence on people's decisions to the extent that the items at risk are construed as forming groups, as opposed to distinct individuals. Construal was manipulated by means of animated displays in which resources at risk moved either independently (promoting individual construal) or jointly (promoting group construal). Results support the hypothesis that (a) decision makers form mental representations which vary in the degree to which resources at risk are construed as groups versus individuals and (b) construal of resources as groups promotes the influence of proportions on decisions and moral judgments.
Number of Pages in PDF File: 8
Keywords: Decision making, Proportion dominance, Entitativity, Individuation, Moral reasoning, Moral judgment, Identifiable victim effect
Date posted: October 6, 2011
© 2016 Social Science Electronic Publishing, Inc. All Rights Reserved.
This page was processed by apollobot1 in 0.234 seconds