|
||||
|
||||
Choice Models for Budgeted Demand and Constrained AllocationTakuya SatomuraKeio University - Faculty of Business and Commerce Jeff BrazellThe Modellers Greg M. AllenbyOhio State University (OSU) - Department of Marketing and Logistics October 5, 2011 Fisher College of Business Working Paper No. 1939109 Abstract: Utility maximization is implicit in models of consumer choice, learning, forward-looking behavior and substitution. It is a central feature of models of market competition built on the aggregation of individual choices, and is assumed in nearly all quantitative models of behavior. Yet, while the assumption of utility maximization is widely present in marketing analysis, it is rarely expressed in a way that constrains the choices that are made. Constrained utility maximization leads to richer tradeoffs among the choices when budgets and allocations are assigned non-trivial roles in the choice process. In this paper we develop alternative models of constrained maximization, and show that models of constrained choice significantly improve the in-sample and predictive fit to the data in two conjoint studies -- a pharmaceutical study of physician drug allocation and a conjoint study of volumetric demand. Inferences about the budget constraint, and extensions to non-conjoint applications, are discussed.
Number of Pages in PDF File: 31 Keywords: Volumetric Demand, Constrained Optimization, Budgeted Choice, Conjoint Analysis JEL Classification: C33, C35, M31 working papers seriesDate posted: October 5, 2011Suggested CitationContact Information
|
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
© 2013 Social Science Electronic Publishing, Inc. All Rights Reserved.
FAQ
Terms of Use
Privacy Policy
Copyright
This page was processed by apollo4 in 0.390 seconds