Did the Slaves Author the Thirteenth Amendment? An Essay in Redemptive History
SUNY Buffalo Law School
October 1, 1993
Yale Journal of Law & Humanities, Vol. 5, pp. 471-505, 1993
Buffalo Legal Studies Research Paper No. 1993-001
American constitutional interpretation is deeply traditionalist, and privileges original intent. The difficulty with thus authorizing the past in interpreting the Thirteenth Amendment is that it purports to abolish custom and tradition as unjust. This essay argues that, given the Amendment’s denunciation of the polity that enacted it as illegitimate, its questionable formal pedigree, and the agency of the slaves in precipitating, defining, and resolving the crisis that enabled it, the slaves have a moral claim to status as its authors. It follows that the original intent guiding interpretation should be that of the slaves themselves.
Number of Pages in PDF File: 36
Keywords: constitutional law, constitutional history, law and literature, slavery, civil rightsAccepted Paper Series
Date posted: October 6, 2011
© 2013 Social Science Electronic Publishing, Inc. All Rights Reserved.
This page was processed by apollo3 in 0.418 seconds