One Size Fits All? Costs and Benefits of Uniform Accounting Standards
47 Pages Posted: 17 Oct 2011
Date Written: September 11, 2011
Abstract
I build a model of neoclassical production to examine the capital market and welfare effects of a uniform accounting standard (like IFRS). Firms vary in their cost of compliance to the standard, and investors vary in their cost of learning diverse standards for capital allocation. A uniform accounting standard increases the quantity of capital in the economy and lowers the cost of capital. However, uniform standards force diverse firms onto the same standard, which reduces welfare. A regulator selects the optimal number and type of standard to balance these competing effects. Uniform accounting standards are better than diverse accounting standards when firm productivity and variation between investors is large, but worse when the cost of investment and variation between firms is large. I draw implications for IFRS/GAAP convergence, and the incentives versus standards debate.
Keywords: International accounting, GAAP, IFRS, FASB, IASB
Suggested Citation: Suggested Citation
Do you have negative results from your research you’d like to share?
Recommended Papers
-
International Accounting Standards and Accounting Quality
By Mary E. Barth, Wayne R. Landsman, ...
-
Mandatory IFRS Reporting Around the World: Early Evidence on the Economic Consequences
By Holger Daske, Luzi Hail, ...
-
International Financial Reporting Standards (IFRS): Pros and Cons for Investors
By Ray Ball
-
Financial Statement Effects of Adopting International Accounting Standards: the Case of Germany
By Mingyi Hung and K.r. Subramanyam
-
Market Reaction to the Adoption of IFRS in Europe
By Chris Armstrong, Mary E. Barth, ...
-
Market Reaction to the Adoption of IFRS in Europe
By Chris Armstrong, Mary E. Barth, ...
-
By Vicentiu Covrig, Mark L. Defond, ...
-
Adopting a Label: Heterogeneity in the Economic Consequences Around IAS/IFRS Adoptions
By Holger Daske, Luzi Hail, ...