Resolution of Investor-State Controversies in Developing Countries

David A. Gantz

University of Arizona - James E. Rogers College of Law

October 10, 2011

Arizona Legal Studies Discussion Paper No. 11-29

The large volume of literature and commentary on resolution of investor-state disputes tends to focus primarily on the rights of the foreign investor and the process through which the investor may protect her interest through investor-state arbitration, either at the World Bank’s ICSID or in some other forum. Where issues relating to governments-as-respondents have been addressed, the emphasis has often been on nations such as the three NAFTA Parties and other relatively large and affluent nations such as Argentina. Until relatively recently, much less attention has been paid to challenges facing small developing respondents, such as the member nations of CAFTA-DR, Chile, Colombia or Ecuador. How, for example, should such governments respond to and manage claims, some of which in magnitude may represent a significant portion of the annual budget of the respondent government, when there is relatively limited in-house legal expertise and experience in such dispute resolution? Fortunately, UNCTAD and others have begun to take such challenges into account and to provide training for respondent government officials. However, further actions are needed, including educating policy makers and the public as to the risks that arise in the investor-state dispute context and how best to address them. Changes in BITs and FTA investment provisions are also warranted. This article identifies the nature of the challenges presented to such governments and suggests practical means of dealing with them more effectively. It addresses, inter alia, coordination issues for the national administering authority; means of identifying and resolving such disputes before they reach the arbitration stage; effective use of outside legal advisers at various stages of the process; factors relating to the selection of arbitrators; administration of the arbitral process; and making current and future bilateral investment treaties more responsive to the procedural needs of respondent government. The article also draws on the experience of a number of nations with experience in responding to and/or litigating investor state disputes.

Number of Pages in PDF File: 41

Keywords: investor-state arbitration, investment, Latin America, CAFTA-DR, NAFTA

working papers series

Download This Paper

Date posted: October 11, 2011  

Suggested Citation

Gantz, David A., Resolution of Investor-State Controversies in Developing Countries (October 10, 2011). Arizona Legal Studies Discussion Paper No. 11-29. Available at SSRN: http://ssrn.com/abstract=1941958 or http://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.1941958

Contact Information

David A. Gantz (Contact Author)
University of Arizona - James E. Rogers College of Law ( email )
P.O. Box 210176
Tucson, AZ 85721-0176
United States
520-621-1801 (Phone)
Feedback to SSRN

Paper statistics
Abstract Views: 643
Downloads: 151
Download Rank: 109,574

© 2014 Social Science Electronic Publishing, Inc. All Rights Reserved.  FAQ   Terms of Use   Privacy Policy   Copyright   Contact Us
This page was processed by apollo6 in 0.359 seconds