Abstract

http://ssrn.com/abstract=1942402
 
 

Footnotes (262)



 


 



Displacement and Preemption: The OPA's Effect on General Maritime Law and State Tort Law Punitive Damages Claims


Thomas C. Galligan Jr.


Colby-Sawyer College

Brittan Bush


Louisiana State University, Baton Rouge - Paul M. Hebert Law Center; Louisiana State University, Baton Rouge - Louisiana Law Review

February 12, 2012

Cumberland Law Review, Vol. 42, No. 1, 2012

Abstract:     
There are many levels at which we must seek to understand the Deepwater Horizon disaster. They include the scientific, the technological, the economic, the regulatory, and the legal. One of the essential ways in which we Americans redress rights and try to right wrongs is through civil litigation, and the Deepwater Horizon disaster has appropriately spawned litigation. Victims of the disaster have filed claims against the various parties allegedly responsible for the explosion and spill. They have filed tort claims arising under general maritime law and state tort law. They have sought compensatory damages as well as punitive damages - punitive damages are designed to punish and deter those allegedly responsible for allegedly reckless, tortuous activity. Those injured have also filed statutory damages claims under the Oil Pollution Act of 1990 (OPA).

The question then, is what, if any effect, does the OPA have on maritime or state punitive damages claims in cases to which it applies? Does the OPA displace or preempt pre-existing claims? Our answer is that punitive damages are recoverable under either general maritime law or state law even if the OPA also applies.

As we explain below, Congress’ intent is clear that the OPA has no effect at all on state law claims. Likewise, punitive damages are still recoverable under the general maritime law in a case to which the OPA also applies. This conclusion is based on several reasons: (1) the OPA is silent on punitive damages, (2) OPA’s express maritime savings provision, (3) OPA’s legislative history, (4) a review of U.S. Supreme Court maritime jurisprudence addressing the effect that the passage of new statute has on a pre-existing general maritime law claim, (5) an analysis of other no fault schemes and their effect on pre-existing tort claims, (6) and the fact that punitive damages are remedial in nature.

Number of Pages in PDF File: 73

Accepted Paper Series


Download This Paper

Date posted: October 11, 2011 ; Last revised: June 22, 2012

Suggested Citation

Galligan, Thomas C. and Bush, Brittan, Displacement and Preemption: The OPA's Effect on General Maritime Law and State Tort Law Punitive Damages Claims (February 12, 2012). Cumberland Law Review, Vol. 42, No. 1, 2012. Available at SSRN: http://ssrn.com/abstract=1942402

Contact Information

Thomas C. Galligan Jr.
Colby-Sawyer College ( email )
541 Main Street
New London, NH 03257
United States
Brittan J. Bush (Contact Author)
Louisiana State University, Baton Rouge - Paul M. Hebert Law Center ( email )
440 Law Center Building
Baton Rouge, LA 70803
United States
Louisiana State University, Baton Rouge - Louisiana Law Review ( email )
Baton Rouge, LA
United States
Feedback to SSRN


Paper statistics
Abstract Views: 424
Downloads: 55
Download Rank: 214,003
Footnotes:  262

© 2014 Social Science Electronic Publishing, Inc. All Rights Reserved.  FAQ   Terms of Use   Privacy Policy   Copyright   Contact Us
This page was processed by apollo8 in 0.297 seconds