Footnotes (355)



Toxic Torts, Causation, and Scientific Evidence after Daubert

Jean M. Eggen

Widener University - Delaware Campus


University of Pittsburgh Law Review, Vol. 55, p. 889, 1994

Causation has been a major obstacle to recovery by toxic tort plaintiffs. In 1993, the United States Supreme Court decided Daubert v. Merrell Dow Pharmaceuticals, Inc., which held that the Federal Rules of Evidence applied to the admissibility of scientific and other expert evidence in the federal courts. The Court fashioned a flexible multi-factored test for courts to use in determining the reliability of the evidence. This article examines Daubert decision and analyzes the questions it left unanswered for toxic tort plaintiffs seeking to rely on epidemiological and other scientific evidence to prove causation. The article focuses on the special problems of scientific evidence in toxic tort cases, such as the problem of novel scientific evidence that may represent an important development, but which may not satisfy the Daubert standard. In addition, the article tackles the sometimes difficult relationship between law and science in the courtroom, particularly the disconnect between scientific certainty and legal certainty. The article concludes that as toxic tort litigation continues to challenge the traditional judicial system in unprecedented ways, the law will need to bend and shape itself to accommodate new kinds of evidence.

Number of Pages in PDF File: 67

Keywords: Daubert, toxic torts, tort law, causation, evidence, scientific evidence

JEL Classification: K13

Download This Paper

Date posted: October 15, 2011  

Suggested Citation

Eggen, Jean M., Toxic Torts, Causation, and Scientific Evidence after Daubert (1994). University of Pittsburgh Law Review, Vol. 55, p. 889, 1994. Available at SSRN: http://ssrn.com/abstract=1943544

Contact Information

Jean Macchiaroli Eggen (Contact Author)
Widener University - Delaware Campus ( email )
PO Box 7474
Wilmington, DE 19803
United States
(302) 477-2155 (Phone)
Feedback to SSRN

Paper statistics
Abstract Views: 361
Downloads: 48
Footnotes:  355

© 2015 Social Science Electronic Publishing, Inc. All Rights Reserved.  FAQ   Terms of Use   Privacy Policy   Copyright   Contact Us
This page was processed by apollo7 in 0.265 seconds