Abstract

http://ssrn.com/abstract=1944332
 
 

Citations (1)



 


 



Enforcing Rights Generated in Court-Connected Mediation - Tension Between the Aspirations of a Private Facilitative Process and the Reality of Public Adversarial Justice


Peter N. Thompson


Hamline University - School of Law

January 1, 2004

Ohio State Journal on Dispute Resolution, Vol. 19, p. 509, 2004

Abstract:     
This article advances the thesis that the number of recent cases and the nature of the claims by parties complaining about their experiences in court-connected mediations suggest that it is time to reassess the courts’ role in supervising and regulating the mediation processes that judges have incorporated into the pre-trial process. The dissonance between the mediation community’s aspirational goals for a conciliatory process and the judicial system’s singular focus on settling cases has not assured a fair process. The courts’ reluctance to supervise the mediation process, for fear that it will become less efficient in getting rid of cases, creates a virtually unregulated enclave of adversarial activity within a process loosely defined as conciliatory and facilitative. This dissonance can create, and has created, both confusion and an unfair process. This article covers the following areas: enforcing mediated settlement agreements, judicial approach, legislative response, commentators on flexible contract principles mixed with bright-line rules, imposing rigid bright-line rules to a process premised on self-determination, tension between contract principles and mediation’s goals, and regulation of the process.

Number of Pages in PDF File: 64

Keywords: Court-connected mediation, mediation, conciliatory, alterative dispute resolution

JEL Classification: J52, K00, K4, K41

Accepted Paper Series


Download This Paper

Date posted: April 11, 2013  

Suggested Citation

Thompson, Peter N., Enforcing Rights Generated in Court-Connected Mediation - Tension Between the Aspirations of a Private Facilitative Process and the Reality of Public Adversarial Justice (January 1, 2004). Ohio State Journal on Dispute Resolution, Vol. 19, p. 509, 2004. Available at SSRN: http://ssrn.com/abstract=1944332

Contact Information

Peter N. Thompson (Contact Author)
Hamline University - School of Law ( email )
1536 Hewitt Avenue
Saint Paul, MN 55104-1237
United States
Feedback to SSRN


Paper statistics
Abstract Views: 115
Downloads: 33
Citations:  1

© 2014 Social Science Electronic Publishing, Inc. All Rights Reserved.  FAQ   Terms of Use   Privacy Policy   Copyright   Contact Us
This page was processed by apollo8 in 0.281 seconds