Abstract

 


 



Ecological Inference in Voting Rights Act Disputes: Where are We Now, and Where Do We Want to Be?


D. James Greiner


Harvard Law School

October 16, 2007

Jurimetrics, Vol. 47, 2007

Abstract:     
Recent developments in law and in quantitative methods have combined to place greater emphasis on coherent and accurate techniques of drawing inferences about racial voting patterns in Voting Rights Act litigation. In this article, I examine the challenge the secret ballot poses for such inferences; I then discuss four so-called “ecological inference” methods designed to address the issue. I argue that the two techniques that have dominated this field for more than 20 years should be abandoned; that a third, well-publicized method should be used only when no other is feasible; and that a fourth, while representing the state of the art at present, has shortcomings that researchers should address. To aid in understanding, I apply each technique outlined to a concrete data set. I conclude with a discussion of what makes a good method.

Number of Pages in PDF File: 53

Keywords: voting rights act, ecological inference, ecological regression, homogeneous precincts analysis, racial bloc voting

JEL Classification: K41

Accepted Paper Series


Download This Paper

Date posted: October 17, 2011  

Suggested Citation

Greiner, D. James, Ecological Inference in Voting Rights Act Disputes: Where are We Now, and Where Do We Want to Be? (October 16, 2007). Jurimetrics, Vol. 47, 2007. Available at SSRN: http://ssrn.com/abstract=1944983

Contact Information

Daniel Greiner (Contact Author)
Harvard Law School ( email )
1575 Massachusetts
Hauser 406
Cambridge, MA 02138
United States
(617) 496-4643 (Phone)
Feedback to SSRN (Beta)


Paper statistics
Abstract Views: 208
Downloads: 53
Download Rank: 195,093

© 2013 Social Science Electronic Publishing, Inc. All Rights Reserved.  FAQ   Terms of Use   Privacy Policy   Copyright
This page was processed by apollo4 in 0.687 seconds