Abstract

http://ssrn.com/abstract=1945142
 
 

Footnotes (100)



 


 



Function, Art and Fashion: Do We Need the EU Design Law?


Uma Suthersanen


Queen Mary University of London, School of Law

October 17, 2011

Queen Mary School of Law Legal Studies Research Paper No. 88/2011

Abstract:     
Intellectual property law is premised on the protection of inventions (patent), literary and artistic property (copyright), and signs (trade mark). Sui generis rights, such as design law, stand outside this fortress and are constantly questioned and re-shaped. One reason why sui generis rights are questionable is that they protect “difficult” subject matter which defy disciplinary and legal boundaries. A prime example of such a sui generis right is “design law”, which has had a tumultuous legislative history since its inception in the eighteenth century. The "design law" debate has centred around three inherent problems. First, there is little consensus as to the nature of protection, and whether it should be considered as industrial property or artisticproperty, or industrial copyright. Secondly, the law has traditionally been befuddled by attempts to instill a functionality doctrine in order to draw clear parameters between art (visually relevant designs) and function (technically dictated designs). Thirdly, there is a tendency to negate copyright protection of designs based on a similar art/function dichotomy. The EU design regime was to be a new approach where designs would be protected as both industrial property (registration) or as copyright (unregistered rights). Moreover, national copyright law was to be applicable despite the existence of sui generis design protection in the EU. This approach has fundamental flaws. The purpose of this paper is to examine the concepts of “design”, “artistic work and “functionality” and suggest that we may need to review the current EU design regime in light of past and recent case law.

Number of Pages in PDF File: 23

Accepted Paper Series


Download This Paper

Date posted: October 17, 2011 ; Last revised: October 27, 2011

Suggested Citation

Suthersanen, Uma, Function, Art and Fashion: Do We Need the EU Design Law? (October 17, 2011). Queen Mary School of Law Legal Studies Research Paper No. 88/2011. Available at SSRN: http://ssrn.com/abstract=1945142

Contact Information

Uma Suthersanen (Contact Author)
Queen Mary University of London, School of Law ( email )
London
United Kingdom
Feedback to SSRN


Paper statistics
Abstract Views: 1,473
Downloads: 357
Download Rank: 46,142
Footnotes:  100

© 2014 Social Science Electronic Publishing, Inc. All Rights Reserved.  FAQ   Terms of Use   Privacy Policy   Copyright   Contact Us
This page was processed by apollo6 in 0.578 seconds