Abstract

http://ssrn.com/abstract=1945248
 
 

Footnotes (24)



 


 



Autobiographical Lies and the First Amendment's Protection of Self-Defining Speech


David S. Han


Pepperdine University School of Law

October 17, 2011

New York University Law Review, Vol. 87, 2012
NYU School of Law, Public Law Research Paper no. 11-79

Abstract:     
This Article explores, through the lens of speech I refer to as “autobiographical lies,” the extent to which the First Amendment protects one’s ability to craft his public persona. Thus far, courts and commentators have generally neglected to address the degree to which this particular autonomy-based value - the interest in individual self-definition - carries distinct weight under the First Amendment. This is unsurprising, since it is rare that an issue arises directly implicating this interest in a manner that isolates it from more traditional free speech principles.

Recently, however, litigation has arisen surrounding the constitutionality of the Stolen Valor Act, a federal statute that criminalizes lying about having received military honors. The Act’s regulation of a particular subset of speech - knowing, factual falsehoods about oneself - uniquely crystallizes the question of whether, and to what extent, the self-definition interest merits protection under the First Amendment. By and large, there is no strong reason rooted in traditional First Amendment interests to protect these sorts of autobiographical lies. But if the self-definition interest has any meaningful constitutional force, then circumstances would surely exist under which such speech merits First Amendment protection, since freely choosing what to tell others about oneself - whether truth, half-truth, or falsehood - is a vital means of controlling how one defines oneself to the world.

After reviewing the current dispute surrounding the Stolen Valor Act, which has divided lower courts and at the time of this writing is pending before the Supreme Court, this Article outlines the doctrinal origins and basic characteristics of the self-definition interest. I argue that if one takes seriously the Supreme Court’s repeated assertions that the First Amendment is designed, at least in part, to preserve individual autonomy, then courts should accord at least some distinct constitutional weight to this interest. I then explore some of the practical implications of recognizing a constitutionally protected self-definition interest and apply these observations to the Stolen Valor Act, concluding that the Act, as currently constituted, should be deemed unconstitutional. Finally, I observe that a constitutionally protected right to define one’s public persona via one’s speech fits comfortably within the Constitution’s general protection of interests deemed essential to individual personhood.

Number of Pages in PDF File: 63

Keywords: First Amendment, Stolen Valor Act, Constitutional Law

Accepted Paper Series


Download This Paper

Date posted: October 18, 2011 ; Last revised: August 10, 2012

Suggested Citation

Han, David S., Autobiographical Lies and the First Amendment's Protection of Self-Defining Speech (October 17, 2011). New York University Law Review, Vol. 87, 2012; NYU School of Law, Public Law Research Paper no. 11-79. Available at SSRN: http://ssrn.com/abstract=1945248

Contact Information

David S. Han (Contact Author)
Pepperdine University School of Law ( email )
24255 Pacific Coast Highway
Malibu, CA 90263
United States
Feedback to SSRN


Paper statistics
Abstract Views: 939
Downloads: 130
Download Rank: 130,191
Footnotes:  24

© 2014 Social Science Electronic Publishing, Inc. All Rights Reserved.  FAQ   Terms of Use   Privacy Policy   Copyright   Contact Us
This page was processed by apollo7 in 0.281 seconds