The Difficulty with Regulating Network Neutrality

Eric Null

affiliation not provided to SSRN

October 19, 2011

Cardozo Arts and Entertainment Law Journal, Vol. 29, pp. 459-493, 2011

Network neutrality is, and has been, an essential design element of the Internet. Increasingly, there has been pressure to move from a neutral network to a network that is optimized for particular functions (such as video streaming), and technology has responded to that call through the creation of a powerful technology called Deep-Packet Inspection. DPI allows access providers to directly violate the neutrality principle because it provides a mechanism for unequal treatment of content. The tension between network neutrality and DPI is significant – so much so that the Federal Communications Commission (“FCC”) has intervened.

The FCC recently published its final Report and Order for Preserving the Open Internet in the Federal Register, which establishes a general principle that neutrality should be safeguarded. Despite this safeguard, the FCC provided for a reasonable network management exception to neutrality, which allows access providers to treat content unequally if the provider is reasonably managing its network. The reasonable network management exception is a broad exception. However, a broad exception, potentially overbroad, may not be the most prudent form for regulating network neutrality.

To determine what form is appropriate for network neutrality regulation, one should engage in a rules-versus-standards analysis specifically in this context. There is no obvious choice, but context can provide useful background when determining whether to regulate with rules or standards.

Network neutrality regulation should be written as a rule, not a standard. Establishing a rule-like regulation will deter non-neutral behavior by access providers, and will preserve the Internet’s neutral architecture and the benefits that equal treatment of content provides. In addition, rule-like regulations reduce the burden placed on enforcers, typically users, of the regulation. For these reasons, the reasonable network management exception should also be worded like a rule; those arguing for a broad, standard-like exception have not successfully demonstrated why a broad exception is required.

Number of Pages in PDF File: 35

Keywords: Network neutrality, open internet, FCC, Federal Communications Commission, rules versus standards, deep packet inspection, error costs, false positives, false negatives, spillovers, positive externalities

Open PDF in Browser Download This Paper

Date posted: October 19, 2011 ; Last revised: December 24, 2013

Suggested Citation

Null, Eric, The Difficulty with Regulating Network Neutrality (October 19, 2011). Cardozo Arts and Entertainment Law Journal, Vol. 29, pp. 459-493, 2011. Available at SSRN: http://ssrn.com/abstract=1946266

Contact Information

Eric Null (Contact Author)
affiliation not provided to SSRN
Feedback to SSRN

Paper statistics
Abstract Views: 936
Downloads: 124
Download Rank: 159,212
Paper comments
No comments have been made on this paper

© 2016 Social Science Electronic Publishing, Inc. All Rights Reserved.  FAQ   Terms of Use   Privacy Policy   Copyright   Contact Us
This page was processed by apollobot1 in 2.203 seconds