|
Based on your IP address, your paper is being delivered by:
|
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
New York, USA
Processing request.
|
Illinois, USA
Processing request.
|
Brussels, Belgium
Processing request.
|
Seoul, Korea
Processing request.
|
California, USA
Processing request.
|
If you have any problems downloading this paper, please click on another Download Location above, or
File name: SSRN-id2223221. ; Size: 608K
|
|
Audit Committee Characteristics and the Safeguarding of Auditor Independence
Ling Lei Lisic George Mason University - Accounting Program
Jian Zhou University of Hawaii at Manoa
February 1, 2013
Abstract:
In this paper, we examine the relation between audit committee characteristics and the safeguarding of auditor independence, as proxied for by whether auditors are dismissed following the issuance of internal control material weakness reports. We use the proportion of current audit committee members that joined the board prior to the Chief Executive Offer taking office to measure audit committee independence in fact. Thus, we distinguish between independence in fact and independence in appearance, where the latter refers to audit committees comprised exclusively of outside board members. We find that although auditors are more likely to be dismissed after the issuance of internal control material weakness reports, this likelihood is lower when audit committees are more independent in fact, when they have more financial expertise, and when they have more governance expertise (measured by the average number of other boards on which audit committee members sit). Our results suggest that audit committee independence in fact matters even when audit committees are required to be fully independent in appearance. Overall, our results demonstrate the importance of audit committees in safeguarding auditor independence in the post-Sarbanes-Oxley period.
Number of Pages in PDF File: 39
Keywords: audit committee independence, financial expertise, internal control, auditor dismissal, auditor independence
JEL Classification: M41, M42
working papers series
Download This Paper
Date posted: October 20, 2011
; Last revised: February 27, 2013
Suggested CitationLisic, Ling Lei and Zhou, Jian, Audit Committee Characteristics and the Safeguarding of Auditor Independence (February 1, 2013). Available at SSRN: http://ssrn.com/abstract=1946343 or http://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.1946343
|
| Feedback to SSRN (Beta) |
|
|
People who downloaded this paper also downloaded:
1.
A Descriptive Study of Factors Associated with the Internal Audit Function Having an Impact: Comparisons between Organizations in a Developed and an Emerging Economy
By
Audrey Gramling,
Irem Nuhoglu, ...
2.
Audit Committee Expertise and Financial Analysts’ and Investors’ Ability to Anticipate Future Earnings
By
John Abernathy,
Tony Kang, ...
3.
Monitoring the Monitors: How Shareholders and Boards Discipline
Ineffective Audit Committee Members and Those Who Serve With Them
By
Steven Kachelmeier,
Stephanie Rasmussen, ...
4.
Using the Internal Audit Function as a Management Training Ground: Is the Monitoring Effectiveness of Internal Auditors Compromised?
By
Margaret Christ,
Adi Masli, ...
5.
Did SOX Fully Address Audit Committee Oversight?: An Empirical Analysis of the Effects of Equity on Audit Committee Independence
By
John Campbell,
James Hansen, ...
6.
The Relation between Earnings Management Independent Directors and Audit Committee: A Study of Italian Listed Companies
By
Francesca Di Donato
and
Giovanni Fiori
7.
The Audit Committee: Management Watchdog or Personal Friend of the CEO?
By
Liesbeth Bruynseels
and
Eddy Cardinaels
8.
Audit Committee Quality, Auditor Independence, and Internal Control Weaknesses
By
Yan Zhang,
Jian Zhou, ...
9.
Auditor Fees and Auditor Independence: Evidence from Going Concern Reporting Decisions
By
Marshall Geiger
and
Allen Blay
10.
Auditors’ Internal Control Over Financial Reporting Decisions: Analysis, Synthesis, and Research Directions
By
Stephen Asare,
Brian Fitzgerald, ...
|
|
|
|