Abstract

http://ssrn.com/abstract=1946465
 


 



The Supreme Court’s Janus Capital Case


Norman S. Poser


Brooklyn Law School

October 19, 2011

The Review of Securities & Commodities Regulation, Vol. 44, p. 205, 2011
Brooklyn Law School Legal Studies Paper No. 252

Abstract:     
In Janus Capital Group, Inc. v. First Derivative Traders, a divided Supreme Court created the unprecedented doctrine that the investment adviser to a mutual fund that drafted and distributed a false prospectus for the fund did not “make” a false statement under Rule 10b-5 because the fund, and not the adviser, had “ultimate authority” over the prospectus. The author argues that the decision was out of touch with reality because it failed to give proper consideration to the unique structure of the mutual fund industry. Furthermore, the decision is an illustration of judicial activism, and is likely to protect fund advisers and other corporate officials from liability for their own fraudulent actions.

Number of Pages in PDF File: 6

Keywords: Rule 10b-5, Securities fraud, Mutual funds

Accepted Paper Series


Download This Paper

Date posted: October 20, 2011  

Suggested Citation

Poser, Norman S., The Supreme Court’s Janus Capital Case (October 19, 2011). The Review of Securities & Commodities Regulation, Vol. 44, p. 205, 2011; Brooklyn Law School Legal Studies Paper No. 252. Available at SSRN: http://ssrn.com/abstract=1946465

Contact Information

Norman S. Poser (Contact Author)
Brooklyn Law School ( email )
250 Joralemon Street
Brooklyn, NY 11201
United States
Feedback to SSRN


Paper statistics
Abstract Views: 921
Downloads: 131
Download Rank: 126,932

© 2014 Social Science Electronic Publishing, Inc. All Rights Reserved.  FAQ   Terms of Use   Privacy Policy   Copyright   Contact Us
This page was processed by apollo8 in 0.312 seconds