Of Constitutional Seances and Color-Blind Ghosts
University of Baltimore School of Law
January 1, 1994
North Carolina Law Review, Vol. 72, No. 2, pp. 401-451, January 1994
University of Baltimore School of Law Legal Studies Research Paper
In his book, The Color-Blind Constitution, Professor Andrew Kull asserts that the Constitution mandates "color blindness" on the part of government actors--that is, they cannot consider race as a factor in any decision-making process. Those who argue that government-sponsored affirmative action programs are based on unconstitutional race-based distinctions support the "color-blind" theory. In fact, litigants in the United States Supreme Court case of Shaw v. Reno, which concerned the state of North Carolina's efforts to use race as a factor in drawing legislative districts, relied on Professor Kull's book to uphold their arguments.
In this essay, Professor Garrett Epps challenges the legal, historical, and sociological bases on which Professor Kull rests his theories. Although Professor Kull's research is extensive, Professor Epps finds that he misinterpreted the arguments of many of the individuals whom he believed supported a color blind constitutional theory and that he ignored or too easily discounted evidence contrary to the color blind conclusion.
In the alternative, Professor Epps offers a theory that better reflects the Constitution's anti-racist meaning: the Constitution forbids any government action that creates or supports a "caste relationship." He concludes that "opposition to caste does offer a principled, workable alternative to color blindness on the one hand and unprincipled racial spoilsmanship on the other."
Number of Pages in PDF File: 52
Keywords: constitutional law, constitutional interpretation, Andrew Kull, Color-Blind Constitution, race, Shaw v. Reno, caste relationship, Supreme Court, Fourteenth Amendment, Voting Rights Act of 1965, racial equality, Roberts v. City of Boston, Frederick Douglass, Comity Clause, Dred Scott v. Sandford
JEL Classification: J78, J79, K19, K39, K49
Date posted: October 22, 2011
© 2016 Social Science Electronic Publishing, Inc. All Rights Reserved.
This page was processed by apollobot1 in 0.187 seconds