Transplanting the European Court of Justice: The Experience of the Andean Tribunal of Justice
Karen J. Alter
Northwestern University - Department of Political Science; University of Copenhagen, Faculty of Law - iCourts Center of Excellence
Laurence R. Helfer
Duke University School of Law
Alexander von Humboldt Institute for Internet & Society
July 18, 2012
American Journal of Comparative Law, Vol. 60(3), p.629 (2012)
Oñati Socio-Legal Series, Vol. 1, No. 4, 2011
Although there is an extensive literature on domestic legal transplants, far less is known about the transplantation of supranational judicial bodies. The Andean Tribunal of Justice (ATJ) is one of nearly a dozen copies of the European Court of Justice (ECJ), and the third most active international court. This article considers the origins and evolution of the ATJ as a transplanted judicial institution. It first reviews the literatures on legal transplants, neofunctionalist theory, and the spread of European ideas and institutions, explaining how the intersection of these literatures informs the study of supranational judicial transplants. The article next explains why the Andean Pact’s member states decided to add a court to their regional integration initiative, why they adapted the European Community model, and how the ECJ’s existence has shaped the evolution of Andean legal doctrine and the political space within which the ATJ operates. We conclude by analyzing how the ATJ’s experience informs the study of supranational transplants and theories of supranational legal integration more generally.
Number of Pages in PDF File: 36
Keywords: European community, Andean community, international courts and tribunals, European Court of Justice, Andean tribunal of justice, regional integration, legal transplants, neofunctionalist theory, ideational diffusionAccepted Paper Series
Date posted: October 24, 2011 ; Last revised: July 19, 2012
© 2014 Social Science Electronic Publishing, Inc. All Rights Reserved.
This page was processed by apollo7 in 0.297 seconds