Abstract

 
 

Citations (1)



 


 



Modelling Arbitration: Evaluating Risks and Settlements of Disputes Using Regret Theory


Abdulla Galadari


Massachusetts Institute of Technology (MIT); Masdar Institute of Science and Technology (MIST); Higher Colleges of Technology

October 25, 2011

International Proceedings of Economics Development and Research, Vol. 15, pp. 89-92, 2011

Abstract:     
This paper presents a mathematical model to evaluate the risks of arbitration in contractual disputes to decide whether or not to raise an arbitration case for a claim. It adds the ingredient of a regret theory approach for taking that decision, if an amicable settlement amount is not agreed. Many other models that are based on decision trees, game theory, and neural networks lack a regret theory approach. The inclusion of regret theory in this model may be adaptable to any other models available making the decision more realistic through a stochastic approach of optimizing the maximum benefit for the minimum regret.

Number of Pages in PDF File: 5

Keywords: arbitration, construction contracts, dispute, modelling, project management, risk, settlement agreements

JEL Classification: C1, C4, C5, C6, C7, C8, D81, K12, K41, L74

Accepted Paper Series


Download This Paper

Date posted: October 26, 2011 ; Last revised: January 10, 2012

Suggested Citation

Galadari, Abdulla, Modelling Arbitration: Evaluating Risks and Settlements of Disputes Using Regret Theory (October 25, 2011). International Proceedings of Economics Development and Research, Vol. 15, pp. 89-92, 2011. Available at SSRN: http://ssrn.com/abstract=1949121

Contact Information

Abdulla Galadari (Contact Author)
Massachusetts Institute of Technology (MIT) ( email )
77 Massachusetts Avenue
50 Memorial Drive
Cambridge, MA 02139-4307
United States
Masdar Institute of Science and Technology (MIST) ( email )
MASDAR
PO Box 54115
Abu Dhabi
United Arab Emirates
Higher Colleges of Technology ( email )
United Arab Emirates
Feedback to SSRN (Beta)


Paper statistics
Abstract Views: 237
Downloads: 17
Citations:  1

© 2013 Social Science Electronic Publishing, Inc. All Rights Reserved.  FAQ   Terms of Use   Privacy Policy   Copyright
This page was processed by apollo5 in 0.656 seconds