Labor Values Are First Amendment Values: Why Union Comprehensive Campaigns Are Protected Speech
Seattle University School of Law
Fordham Law Review, Vol. 79, p. 2617, 2011
Seattle University School of Law Research Paper No. 11-28
Corporate targets of union “comprehensive campaigns” increasingly have responded by filing civil Racketeer Influenced and Corrupt Organizations Act (RICO) lawsuits alleging that unions’ speech and petitioning activities are extortionate. These lawsuits are the descendants of the Supreme Court’s unexplained treatment of much labor speech as less worthy of protection than other types of speech. Starting from the position that speech that promotes democratic discourse deserves top-tier First Amendment protection, I argue that labor speech - which plays a unique role in civil society - should be on an equal footing with civil rights speech. Thus, even if union advocacy qualifies as legal extortion, the First Amendment should trump civil RICO enforcement, with two limited exceptions: speech that is actually malicious, and speech that imminently threatens to force an employer to choose between breaking the law and suffering significant economic harm or shutting its doors altogether.
Number of Pages in PDF File: 53
Keywords: comprehensive campaigns, labor, First Amendment, free speech, deliberative democracyAccepted Paper Series
Date posted: October 26, 2011
© 2014 Social Science Electronic Publishing, Inc. All Rights Reserved.
This page was processed by apollo4 in 0.297 seconds