The Cain Plan v. the Able Plan: An Empirical Analysis
Nicholas A. Paleveda
October 26, 2011
Northeastern University School of Law Research Paper
'The Cain Plan v. the Able Plan' is an empirical analysis of the 9-9-9 plan proposed by Mr. Cain and supported by Mr. Laffer. The author reviews the simplicity of the plan and concludes that the Cain tax plan does not support its intended results. The Cain tax plan has gained traction with the general public even though it does not appear to have any substance behind the plan or thought as to the intended results. Laffer also offers conclusions without any substantiation as to how the conclusions will be reached. A brief read for a simple plan.
Number of Pages in PDF File: 8
Keywords: tax, tax plan, Cain, Laffer
JEL Classification: H20, H21, H22, H23, H24, H25, H26working papers series
Date posted: October 29, 2011
© 2014 Social Science Electronic Publishing, Inc. All Rights Reserved.
This page was processed by apollo5 in 0.641 seconds