|
||||
|
||||
Comparative Politics and the Synthetic Control MethodAlberto AbadieHarvard University - Harvard Kennedy School (HKS); National Bureau of Economic Research (NBER) Alexis Diamondaffiliation not provided to SSRN Jens HainmuellerMassachusetts Institute of Technology (MIT) - Department of Political Science June 2012 MIT Political Science Department Research Paper No. 2011-25 Abstract: In recent years a widespread consensus has emerged about the necessity of establishing bridges between the quantitative and the qualitative approaches to empirical research in political science. In this article, we discuss the use of the synthetic control method (Abadie and Gardeazabal, 2003; Abadie, Diamond, and Hainmueller, 2010) as a way to bridge the quantitative/qualitative divide in comparative politics. The synthetic control method provides a systematic way to choose comparison units in comparative case studies. This systematization opens the door to precise quantitative inference in small-sample comparative studies, without precluding the application of qualitative approaches. That is, the synthetic control method allows researchers to put "qualitative flesh on quantitative bones"' (Tarrow, 1995). We illustrate the main ideas behind the synthetic control method with an application where we study the economic impact of the 1990 German reunification in West Germany.
Number of Pages in PDF File: 34 Keywords: comparative case studies, comparative politics, synthetic control method, Germany JEL Classification: C23 working papers seriesDate posted: October 28, 2011 ; Last revised: June 14, 2012Suggested CitationContact Information
|
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
© 2013 Social Science Electronic Publishing, Inc. All Rights Reserved.
FAQ
Terms of Use
Privacy Policy
Copyright
This page was processed by apollo6 in 0.437 seconds