Abstract

http://ssrn.com/abstract=1950324
 
 

Footnotes (255)



 


 



Secondary Liability for Securities Fraud: Gatekeepers in State Court


Jennifer J. Johnson


Lewis & Clark Law School

2011

Delaware Journal of Corporate Law (DJCL), Vol. 36, No. 2, 2011

Abstract:     
The recent economic meltdown exposed numerous Ponzi schemes. When promoters of fraudulent ventures are unable to provide restitution to their victims, plaintiffs seek out other sources of repayment including professionals and other secondary participants in the transactions that precipitated their losses. Although most scholars agree that professionals can perform an important role in deterring securities fraud, scholarly opinions vary widely on the appropriate liability regime, if any, that these gatekeepers should face.

While civil liability for secondary participants in securities fraud was once well accepted in the federal courts, in 1994 the Supreme Court invalidated such claims as beyond the purview of Section 10(b) of the 1934 Securities Exchange Act and Rule 10b-5. In contrast, there is a robust tradition of aiding and abetting liability in most state blue sky statutes. Unlike the federal implied Rule 10b-5 cause of action, state blue sky laws contain express secondary liability statutes that do not have strict scienter standards or rigorous pleading requirements. Indeed, some state statutes are negligence based and contain burden-shifting provisions that require non-seller defendants to establish that they were not negligent in failing to discover the seller's fraud.

This Article traces the development of secondary liability under state securities laws and contrasts various state regimes and their federal counterparts. It also reviews federal efforts to restrict states from adjudicating securities related claims. Relying on available empirical evidence, the Article ultimately concludes that Congress should reverse its propensity of the last decade to preempt state securities actions and should recognize the valuable contribution of such actions in addressing fraud, particularly fraud committed upon retail investors.

Number of Pages in PDF File: 45

Keywords: Delaware, Journal, Corporate, Law, Liability, Securities, Fraud, Ponzi, 10b-5

Accepted Paper Series


Download This Paper

Date posted: October 29, 2011  

Suggested Citation

Johnson, Jennifer J., Secondary Liability for Securities Fraud: Gatekeepers in State Court (2011). Delaware Journal of Corporate Law (DJCL), Vol. 36, No. 2, 2011. Available at SSRN: http://ssrn.com/abstract=1950324

Contact Information

Jennifer J. Johnson (Contact Author)
Lewis & Clark Law School ( email )
10015 S.W. Terwilliger Blvd.
Portland, OR 97219
United States
Feedback to SSRN


Paper statistics
Abstract Views: 928
Downloads: 62
Download Rank: 68,577
Footnotes:  255

© 2014 Social Science Electronic Publishing, Inc. All Rights Reserved.  FAQ   Terms of Use   Privacy Policy   Copyright   Contact Us
This page was processed by apollo3 in 0.485 seconds