ASIC’s Role as Intervener: When Should the Regulator Intervene in Private Litigation?
Joanna Mary Bird
University of Sydney - Faculty of Law
October 27, 2011
Company and Securities Law Journal, Vol. 28, No. 7, pp. 460-474, 2010
Sydney Law School Research Paper No. 11/80
In recent years, the Australian Securities and Investments Commission (ASIC) has increasingly intervened in private litigation. It is interesting to consider why ASIC expends its resources intervening in this private litigation, given that – at least from its point of view – one of the principal benefits of this private litigation is that it enables enforcement of the of the corporate, securities and financial services regulatory regime without expenditure of its resources. ASIC intervention in private litigation can be grouped into three categories: commencement of proceedings under s 50 of the Australian Securities and Investments Commission Act 2001 (Cth); intervention under s 1330 of the Corporations Act 2001 (Cth); and, intervention with leave of the court. This article examines when ASIC has exercised its power to intervene in each of these three categories and when it should exercise its powers in each of these three categories. The article concludes with some general observations on the need to clarify and better articulate ASIC’s policy on intervention.
Number of Pages in PDF File: 20
Keywords: Corporate Law, Australian Securities and Investments Commission, Regulators, Intervention in Private Litigation
JEL Classification: K10, K30, K22Accepted Paper Series
Date posted: October 28, 2011
© 2014 Social Science Electronic Publishing, Inc. All Rights Reserved.
This page was processed by apollo3 in 0.625 seconds