Does it Matter Who Pays for Bond Ratings? Historical Evidence
John (Xuefeng) Jiang
Michigan State University
Mary Harris Stanford
Texas Christian University - Department of Accounting
Nov 3, 2011
Journal of Financial Economics (JFE), Forthcoming
Fordham University School of Business Research Paper No. 1950748
We test whether Standard and Poor’s (S&P) assigns higher bond ratings after it switches from investor-pay to issuer-pay fees in 1974. Using Moody’s rating for the same bond as a benchmark, we find that when S&P charges investors and Moody’s charges issuers, S&P’s ratings are lower than Moody’s. Once S&P adopts issuer-pay, its ratings increase and no longer differ from Moody’s. More importantly, S&P only assigns higher ratings for bonds that are subject to greater conflicts of interest, measured by higher expected rating fees or lower credit quality. These findings suggest that the issuer-pay model leads to higher ratings.
Number of Pages in PDF File: 45
Keywords: Credit Ratings, Investor Pay, Issuer Pay, Moody’s, S&P
JEL Classification: G18, G20, G28
Date posted: October 29, 2011 ; Last revised: March 12, 2012
© 2016 Social Science Electronic Publishing, Inc. All Rights Reserved.
This page was processed by apollobot1 in 0.219 seconds