Abstract

http://ssrn.com/abstract=1953506
 
 

Footnotes (88)



 


 



Competition Policy and the Application of Section 5 of the Federal Trade Commission Act


William E. Kovacic


George Washington University - Law School

Marc Winerman


Independent

November 2, 2011

Antitrust Law Journal, Vol. 76, p. 929, 2010
GWU Legal Studies Research Paper No. 590
GWU Law School Public Law Research Paper No. 590

Abstract:     
Since the 1970’s, U.S. courts generally have narrowed the range of single-firm behavior subject to condemnation as monopolization under the Sherman Act. This article examines the possibility of applying principles from Section 5 of the Federal Trade Commission Act to address apparent instances of anticompetitive conduct that go beyond the reach of other federal antitrust statutes. The FTC, through Section 5, offers a superior platform for elaborating competition policy, has the tools to perform empirical and policy work that can inform the design of legal rules, and is a specialized tribunal whose Section 5 decisions have no collateral effect in private cases. However, FTC’s application of Section 5 has played a fairly insignificant role in shaping competition policy. Its experience with Section 5 has a bleak record of establishing distinctive competition policy jurisprudence both because of federal court reluctance to sustain its decisions due to concerns about the absence of limiting principles and doubts about the depth and quality of FTC’s expertise; and hostile legislative reactions to FTC’s use of Section 5 that object to Section 5’s reach. Before Section 5 enforcement can be expanded, the FTC must develop a strategy that rest upon corrections to Section 5’s past failings. This requires (1) using policy statements or guidelines to state FTC’s views about what constitutes an unfair method, describe how the agency will exercise its enforcement discretion, and establish a high-level framework for analyzing Section 5 cases in adjudication; (2) articulating a framework that accounts for similarities to, as well as differences from, other antitrust laws; and (3) and building institutional competence by using research and policy instruments to signal to courts that the FTC has a sound basis for specific proposed application of Section 5.

Number of Pages in PDF File: 23

Keywords: Federal Trade Commission, Section 5 or Section 5 Enforcement, Competition policy, Antitrust, Sherman Act

JEL Classification: K21, H11, K40, K23, D42, L40, L12

Accepted Paper Series





Download This Paper

Date posted: November 2, 2011  

Suggested Citation

Kovacic, William E. and Winerman, Marc, Competition Policy and the Application of Section 5 of the Federal Trade Commission Act (November 2, 2011). Antitrust Law Journal, Vol. 76, p. 929, 2010; GWU Legal Studies Research Paper No. 590; GWU Law School Public Law Research Paper No. 590. Available at SSRN: http://ssrn.com/abstract=1953506

Contact Information

William E. Kovacic (Contact Author)
George Washington University - Law School ( email )
2000 H Street, N.W.
Washington, DC 20052
United States
202.994.8123 (Phone)
HOME PAGE: http://www.law.gwu.edu/faculty/profile.aspx?id=1731

Marc Winerman
Independent ( email )
No Address Available
United States
Feedback to SSRN


Paper statistics
Abstract Views: 710
Downloads: 135
Download Rank: 129,971
Footnotes:  88

© 2014 Social Science Electronic Publishing, Inc. All Rights Reserved.  FAQ   Terms of Use   Privacy Policy   Copyright   Contact Us
This page was processed by apollo3 in 0.375 seconds