Drop the Shoe: A Law of Personal Jurisdiction
Douglas D. McFarland
Hamline University - School of Law
January 1, 2003
Missouri Law Review, Vol. 68, No. 4, p. 753, Fall 2003
In 1877, the Supreme Court decided PENNOYER v. NEFF by borrowing international law and conflict of laws principles to shape a law of personal jurisdiction based on territorial power of the states. PENNOYER held that an unwilling, nonresident defendant must be served within the boundaries of the state. In 1945, the Supreme Court started afresh in INTERNATIONAL SHOE CO. v. WASHINGTON. The jurisdictional reach of a court expanded beyond its state borders. The author argues that the Supreme Court should again start afresh. A workable test placed between the extreme rigidity of PENNOYER and the extreme malleability of INTERNATIONAL SHOE is needed. This article begins in Part II with an examination of the origins of the INTERNATIONAL SHOE minimum contacts test, and then in Part III analyzes and critiques the opinion and the test. Part IV looks at later Supreme Court cases that attempt to refine and apply the test, and Part V looks at the same pattern for other federal courts and state courts. These Parts lead to the conclusion that the minimum contacts test should be abandoned in favor a new law for personal jurisdiction, and so to Part VI, which proposes that the Court should “drop the Shoe.” After an examination in Part VII of whether state boundaries should be considered in the formulation of a new law of personal jurisdiction, the article proposes new law in Part VIII. In order to determine the practicality of the proposed new law, the article applies it to the facts presented in previous Supreme Court personal jurisdiction cases, and to some of today’s commonly recurring factual situations, in Part IX.
Number of Pages in PDF File: 59
Keywords: Personal jurisdiction, Pennoyer v. Neff, International Shoe Co. v. Washington, nonconsenting nonresident, nonresident, minimum contacts, long arm jurisdictionAccepted Paper Series
Date posted: November 19, 2011
© 2013 Social Science Electronic Publishing, Inc. All Rights Reserved.
This page was processed by apollo1 in 0.422 seconds