Abstract

http://ssrn.com/abstract=1956657
 
 

References (1)



 
 

Footnotes (147)



 


 



Judicial Reasoning in Constitutional Courts: A European Perspective


András Jakab


Institute for Legal Studies, Hungarian Academy of Sciences, Centre for Social Sciences; Pazmany Peter Catholic University, Faculty of Law and Political Sciences

April 14, 2012

German Law Journal 2013/8. pp. 1215-1278

Abstract:     
In this paper we are going to analyse how constitutional courts are able to extract the most meaning from a (necessarily) short text, such as a Constitution, with the use of sophisticated tricks (or methods) of interpretation. Partly with the help of these methods, and partly on the basis of text-independent speculations, constitutional courts and legal scholars are able to develop a system of concepts (a Rechtsdogmatik or its specific constitutional part, the Verfassungsdogmatik) considerably more sophisticated than the one of the actual text of the Constitution in order to serve as a helping toolkit for the solution of future cases. The nature of this conceptual system will be analysed, before we turn to the question of styles of constitutional reasoning. The analysis concentrates on the practice of European constitutional courts, though for purposes of classification and comparison, non-European practices will also be mentioned.

Number of Pages in PDF File: 45

Keywords: constitutional reasoning, Verfassungsdogmatik, legal reasoning, effet utile, Scalia, living tree, legal method, Ius Publicum Europaeum, originalism, Begriffsjurisprudenz, plain meaning rule, Golden Rule, literal rule, purposive interpretation, teleological interpretation, Brandeis Brief, analogy

JEL Classification: K10, K30


Open PDF in Browser Download This Paper

Date posted: November 8, 2011 ; Last revised: August 17, 2013

Suggested Citation

Jakab, András, Judicial Reasoning in Constitutional Courts: A European Perspective (April 14, 2012). German Law Journal 2013/8. pp. 1215-1278. Available at SSRN: http://ssrn.com/abstract=1956657 or http://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.1956657

Contact Information

Andras Jakab (Contact Author)
Institute for Legal Studies, Hungarian Academy of Sciences, Centre for Social Sciences ( email )
Országház u. 30.
Budapest, H-1014
Hungary
Pazmany Peter Catholic University, Faculty of Law and Political Sciences ( email )
Szentkirályi utca 28
Budapest
Hungary
Feedback to SSRN


Paper statistics
Abstract Views: 1,235
Downloads: 357
Download Rank: 61,276
References:  1
Footnotes:  147

© 2016 Social Science Electronic Publishing, Inc. All Rights Reserved.  FAQ   Terms of Use   Privacy Policy   Copyright   Contact Us
This page was processed by apollobot1 in 0.250 seconds