Footnotes (101)



The Incredible Shrinking Confrontation Clause

Jeffrey Bellin

William & Mary Law School

November 1, 2011

Boston University Law Review, Vol. 92 p. 1865, 2012

Sharp turns in the Supreme Court’s recent Confrontation Clause jurisprudence have left scholars reeling from conflicting emotions: exhilaration, despair, denial, and soon, perhaps, cynical acceptance. While most commentators celebrated the demise of the incoherent Ohio v. Roberts framework, their excitement largely faded as the Court’s decisions in Davis v. Washington and Bryant v. Michigan revealed nascent flaws in the evolving doctrine and sharply curtailed the newly revitalized confrontation right.

Recent scholarship strives to reanimate the jurisprudence by expanding the doctrinal definition of “testimonial” statements – the sole form of evidence that the Court now recognizes as implicating the Confrontation Clause. This Article targets a similar objective through a less-traveled path. It accepts the Court’s focus on, and definition of, “testimonial” statements as a valid, even inevitable, jurisprudential development. This Article seeks instead to expand the reach of the confrontation right to “nontestimonial” hearsay, arguing that constitutional limits – albeit less strict ones – are also warranted for this type of evidence in light of the policies, text, and history of the Confrontation Clause. The Article then details how the Supreme Court can (consistent with the overarching historical, textual, and policy arguments noted above) integrate these limits on the admission of nontestimonial hearsay into its new jurisprudence.

Number of Pages in PDF File: 52

Keywords: Confrontation Clause, Sixth Amendment, Crawford, Davis, Bryant, testimonial, hearsay, cross-examination

Open PDF in Browser Download This Paper

Date posted: November 9, 2011 ; Last revised: January 12, 2013

Suggested Citation

Bellin, Jeffrey, The Incredible Shrinking Confrontation Clause (November 1, 2011). Boston University Law Review, Vol. 92 p. 1865, 2012. Available at SSRN: http://ssrn.com/abstract=1956748

Contact Information

Jeffrey Bellin (Contact Author)
William & Mary Law School ( email )
South Henry Street
P.O. Box 8795
Williamsburg, VA 23187-8795
United States
Feedback to SSRN

Paper statistics
Abstract Views: 993
Downloads: 171
Download Rank: 130,237
Footnotes:  101
People who downloaded this paper also downloaded:
1. Undercover Policing, Overstated Culpability
By Katie Tinto

© 2016 Social Science Electronic Publishing, Inc. All Rights Reserved.  FAQ   Terms of Use   Privacy Policy   Copyright   Contact Us
This page was processed by apollobot1 in 0.672 seconds