Abstract

http://ssrn.com/abstract=1956748
 
 

Footnotes (101)



 


 



The Incredible Shrinking Confrontation Clause


Jeffrey Bellin


William & Mary Law School

November 1, 2011

Boston University Law Review, Vol. 92 p. 1865, 2012

Abstract:     
Sharp turns in the Supreme Court’s recent Confrontation Clause jurisprudence have left scholars reeling from conflicting emotions: exhilaration, despair, denial, and soon, perhaps, cynical acceptance. While most commentators celebrated the demise of the incoherent Ohio v. Roberts framework, their excitement largely faded as the Court’s decisions in Davis v. Washington and Bryant v. Michigan revealed nascent flaws in the evolving doctrine and sharply curtailed the newly revitalized confrontation right.

Recent scholarship strives to reanimate the jurisprudence by expanding the doctrinal definition of “testimonial” statements – the sole form of evidence that the Court now recognizes as implicating the Confrontation Clause. This Article targets a similar objective through a less-traveled path. It accepts the Court’s focus on, and definition of, “testimonial” statements as a valid, even inevitable, jurisprudential development. This Article seeks instead to expand the reach of the confrontation right to “nontestimonial” hearsay, arguing that constitutional limits – albeit less strict ones – are also warranted for this type of evidence in light of the policies, text, and history of the Confrontation Clause. The Article then details how the Supreme Court can (consistent with the overarching historical, textual, and policy arguments noted above) integrate these limits on the admission of nontestimonial hearsay into its new jurisprudence.

Number of Pages in PDF File: 52

Keywords: Confrontation Clause, Sixth Amendment, Crawford, Davis, Bryant, testimonial, hearsay, cross-examination

Accepted Paper Series


Download This Paper

Date posted: November 9, 2011 ; Last revised: January 12, 2013

Suggested Citation

Bellin, Jeffrey, The Incredible Shrinking Confrontation Clause (November 1, 2011). Boston University Law Review, Vol. 92 p. 1865, 2012. Available at SSRN: http://ssrn.com/abstract=1956748

Contact Information

Jeffrey Bellin (Contact Author)
William & Mary Law School ( email )
South Henry Street
P.O. Box 8795
Williamsburg, VA 23187-8795
United States
Feedback to SSRN


Paper statistics
Abstract Views: 666
Downloads: 138
Download Rank: 118,219
Footnotes:  101

© 2014 Social Science Electronic Publishing, Inc. All Rights Reserved.  FAQ   Terms of Use   Privacy Policy   Copyright   Contact Us
This page was processed by apollo7 in 0.328 seconds